got confused enough that I believe this should have been written this way:
In the interest of accuracy, the [reviewer] above is one of my client’s ex-spouse whom we won a case from.
That isn’t clearer at all.
Mines, or Agnew’s response?
I reworded Agnew’s response because I misread it as if a client used es ex-spouse’s account to write the review [in es behalf], and not that the losing ex-spouse wrote this scathing review.
Your version was worse, I understood the original just fine.
How would u write it so my former confusion wouldn’t misread?
I’m not sure, it made sense to me.
It didn’t to me at first read, and my upvoter.
Now, if I was in a similar position, I would respond:
Case No. #####, the poster above was an opponent that lost against my case against es.
