• Big Baby Thor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Also, it will introduce: snitchonomics.

    Mass surveillance is here, but what if you could be an annoying little shit in the local community? Introducing: snitchonomics. Go around your neighborhood, discover discrepancies, automate your snitching and become a toadie for the local commissars.

    Meta: the Nazis would have loved us.

  • Cris_Citrus (he/him <3)@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not like meta has a long history of ignoring obvious, enormous problems theyre causing that experts keep pleading with them to take seriously. Like in Myanmar. Where it has killed an enormous number of people and the death toll keeps rising.

    I’m sure they’ll do something this time

    • lmmarsano@group.lt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Or don’t, because we aren’t fragile ninnies unfamiliar with the concept of carrying a microphone & camera everywhere we go & easily carried away by sensational headlines for dumbasses.

      • crapwittyname@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The cameras and microphones we carry around are not hidden, and one can tell when one is being recorded by them, ninny.

        • lmmarsano@group.lt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Nah, not really. When someone is holding their mobile device, we haven’t the slightest clue unless they’re overt & clumsy about it. No indicator light, either. This selective outrage is peak ninny nonsense for dullards who can’t manage a second’s thought & need fellow average brains to point this out.

  • frunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I found this morsel particularly poignant:

    "Ironically, Meta expected rights groups to be too busy to step in, given the disastrous geopolitical climate.

    “We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns,” the document reads, as quoted by the NYT."

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s particularly evil. No matter what their lame rationalizations will be, this is how we know that they created this tech in bad faith, and they intend to use it in bad faith.