Liberal Democrats leader Sir Ed Davey is calling on the government to start building a “fully independent British nuclear deterrent” to end the UK’s reliance on the US.

The UK has operational control of its nuclear arsenal, including British-built warheads, but it depends on the US to supply and maintain the Trident missiles that would deliver them.

In a speech to his party’s spring conference in York on Sunday, Sir Ed will argue the UK’s continued reliance on US support is an unacceptable risk to national security.

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      This is about the missiles not the warheads. Britain already manufactures those and doesn’t conduct testing.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      To be clear, the UK already has a massive nuclear arsenal. This is just about building them domestically (and only the delivery system, they already build warheads) instead of importing. So, while you’re not wrong per se, the argument you’re trying to have kind of came and went a while ago.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      This belies a complete and total ignorance of the entire topic of strategic nuclear deterrence, and an extremely naive geopolitical worldview.

      For case studies of why nuclear deterrence is important, and why a lack thereof can be catastrophic to the state in question, see:

      • Ukraine
      • Iran
      • North Korea (is effectively un-invadeable because of their nuclear weapons)

      Moreover, this is not an escalation. It’s moving towards strategic independence from a (former) ally that has become deeply unreliable.

  • vpol@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    UK can cooperate with other EU countries. Pretty sure Poland gonna be very interested. Germany, Italy.

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          Britain and Poland would have to withdraw from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. The only state to do so to date is North Korea and it would be a highly troubling precedent.

          • DandomRude@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            I also believe that a nuclear arms race would have catastrophic consequences for the world, but unfortunately, Russia, Israel, and the US are making it all too clear that international treaties are, sadly, worthless.

            Right now, it would be important to find diplomatic solutions and return to a peaceful, international dialogue, but I fear that this is simply not possible with the unscrupulous despots at the helm of these powerful countries. They believe that international law does not apply to them and want to establish the law of the jungle as the sole premise of world politics - they commit the most horrific war crimes and apparently believe they have the right to terrorize the world simply because they can. As long as their heinous crimes go unpunished and these monsters remain at the helm of their countries, I fear that the world must arm itself to avoid becoming their next victim.

      • bearboiblake@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Nuclear proliferation would probably lead to a safer world. Look at North Korea, they are left alone by imperialists because they have the big red button. We could distribute nukes to everyone so there is universal MAD.

        May also end the world, but we’re already on the way there.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    If only there was a nearby group of nations we could share this financial burden with.