• fullsquare@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        no, because they have separate comms using completely different bands. esp when you’re talking about military

        if you switch to different band, probably nonstandard and unlicensed, then there must be someone else to listen

        • thefactremains@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          That’s actually what makes LoRa meshes interesting here - the chirp spread spectrum is genuinely hard to jam without wideband power, and the ISM bands they ride on (433/868/915 MHz) are too economically important for a state actor to blanket-jam without taking out IoT, logistics, and industrial telemetry as collateral. The asymmetry flips: jamming costs them more than it costs you.

          • fullsquare@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            lora bitrate and radiated power are tiny and such considerations are only important in peacetime. gps is jammed now routinely and it’s more important than 95% of iot dogshit. telemetry and remote control that matters is either wired or has reserved separate band, like power grid switches. not sure wdym by logistics

            you also have to be stealthy and if you emit you’re seen and if you’re seen you’ll be found and soon dead. lora doesn’t help you with that especially if you increase power to overcome jamming. using starlink in iran now for example is a capital offense. last time i’ve checked, irgc ew looks for starlink wifi and they can find it even if it’s renamed because of its distinct signature. it takes less to spot lora. they do not look for uplink for some reason but they try to jam it and downlink too