Carney and Co are lowering gas/diesel taxes:

The move means that the cost of gas will drop by 10 cents on a litre of gasoline and four cents per litre of diesel starting on Monday and lasting until Labour Day. The fuel tax holiday, which Carney said would also see the four cent per litre excise tax removed on aviation fuel, is expected to cost an estimated $2.4 billion.

One of the aims is to improve the affordability hit we’re taking because of the US/Israel war with Iraq.

Does the tax holiday make sense to you? Could it be done better?

  • sbv@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    The removal of the tax provides immediate relief.

    It doesn’t provide direct relief to people without cars.

    Fuel prices have already increased more than the amount of the tax holiday, so other goods will continue to increase in price.

    The other measures make sense.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It doesn’t provide direct relief to people without cars.

      For sure. Hence mentioning car-dependency. I don’t drive but everywhere outside of metro areas is car-country and there’s no alternative.

      Either way a shortage is impending and distributing based on price means the wealthier get more for often less than necessary purposes. Which is why I’d look for a different distribution mechanism, a need-based mechanism. E.g. rural transportation and farming should get more/cheap fuel, F150/RAM1500 commuters in the GTA should get less/more expensive fuel.