• Pan0wski@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    While I’m glad he got the sentence I was sure that he would get more, especially after all the disrespect he showed during trial.

  • Codpiece@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I don’t suppose there’s any prisoner swaps with North Korean hard labour camps is there?

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Fair is fair… North Korea was sending balloons filled with garbage over the border for a while - might be time to send some back.

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Might be able to work something out. The South Korean president is trying to normalize relations with the North and formally end the war I believe.

      I mean. The entire world needs to apologize to the leaders of the North. At least on world politics matter. They literally got nukes, flexed them, and then left the rest of the world alone only to be proven correct about the need to obtain nukes to remain sovereign and not get invaded.

      Iran and Ukraine learned the hard way.

      If you have nukes, don’t give them up! Even if you don’t have launch codes. Doesn’t matter. Don’t give up those nukes.

      If you don’t have nukes but someone says “they’re trying to build nukes”; you fucking build nukes as fast as possible. Even if you had no plans to.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      It sounds horrible, but I think we lost something when we made it impossible to get away with fighting someone for doing stupid shit. There’s too many cameras now and, even if they started it by doing something antagonistic, you’ll be arrested and held accountable because they technically didn’t assault you. If this happened in like the 50s (discounting race and everything else, only his actions), he’d get his ass kicked. Everyone around would likely support it.

      Now, the only social system to punish them is shaming, and shaming them is exactly what they want. Shaming them gives them publicity. Publicity gets them money. Literally the best option is to ignore them, which absolutely does nothing to stop it, but at least it doesn’t encourage it.

      I’m not saying we should go back to the 50s. I’m only saying that sometimes people need consequences, like you said. If the legal system can’t provide it, we need an extra-legal solution, and we don’t have that anymore. We did in the past, though it was often used for evil (lynching and lots of racist/homophobic/other-phobic stuff), it also served a purpose.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Agreed. Shame is weaponized by the shameless, especially in our “attention as currency” culture, and other consequences are necessary to maintain a polite self-policed society. I think a lot of laws about this kind of thing were written for legal expediency over sociological improvement.

        I do believe some places have “mutual combat” and “fighting words” clauses.

        Basically, if you’re willingly antagonizing and harassing somehody with insults and/or threats, especially depending on severity, they get some leeway in shutting you up if asking nicely doesn’t help.

        Mutual combat is basically the law being looser when “two people agreed to fight each other” which, I dunno, it felt worth mentioning lol.

        Unfortunately I think we’re seeing a breakdown of humans keeping each other in check and willingness to act based on a severely litigious society (engaging with the law can quickly ruin your life even if you’re innocent), and adult expectations mimicking the inneffectual “zero tolerance” policies of failed school systems, where any physical contact for any reason is your fault, and you’re supposed to go tattle to government and let them slowly do nothing if somebody is being a problem.

        On one hand, you’re right, at least this legal framework somewhat prevents mobs of violent vigilantes enforcing their views on others, but also it cushions and lessens the burden of responsibility from malignant social parasites (like this guy, and the ones in office).

        *I assert that this comment is entirely opinion and I’m by no means a lawyer. This should be obvious because Internet. Lol

  • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    “Distributing sexual deepfakes”.

    Yeah, that sounds a lot more serious than simply harassing people, yet it’s only mentioned for a single sentence here.

  • finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    When he finishes his sentence, I hope he goes to China next. They have a history of great tolerance with people who disrupt the social order.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      china is a little bipolar, they seem some westerners useful to them, if they make companies look good, pratically a propaganda tool. i dont he would be useful in china. the Whiter the better, but they will go for a POC if they are rich or famous.

      • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Because in Japan, they’d be had for battery. Even self defense in Japan as defined as enough, and only enough, to flee in most cases; punching someone who punches you doesn’t qualify if you can remove yourself from the situation otherwise.

        • Snowcano@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Oh yeah, I’m aware. But there are plenty of dudes down here that probably wouldn’t have hesitated anyway had they crossed paths with this idiot.

      • Vile_port_aloo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Sure people tried, just slapping about and I assume he enjoyed the attention. Like the other Vile social media guy that got arrested in Thailand ( Asia) when he gets out he’ll just be even more vile.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Ya’ll realize that hating on this dude is tantamount to contributing to his Patroon, right? He’s a rage-baiter and judging by the comments, a quite good one.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Ya’ll realize that hating on this dude is tantamount to contributing to his Patroon, right?

      How’s that?

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Saying someone is a good rage baiter when their shit posting puts them in prison is like saying Timothy Treadwell was good at taking care of bears

      • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I’m on a Herzog kick atm so got the reference. Otherwise I would have been down a rabbit hole in a heartbeat.

  • wheezy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    He has also been accused of harassing people while travelling in Japan and Israel.

    I’m conflicted. Like, fuck him for being an annoying tourist - but he also harassed Israelis.

    Broken clock I guess.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Well not really for public nuisance, it was about “distributing sexual deepfakes”.

    Oh but I am sure threatening the judge thing did not help.