• jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    They joke, but last week it was shortened to 10^78. At this rate, we’ve only got about six weeks left.

    • Town@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Do black holes evaporate trillions of trillions of times faster than expected? Supermassive ones were expected to take around 10^100 years.

                • psud@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Consider supermassive black holes. They are the largest entities in the universe and they exist in nearly every galaxy. They aren’t going to get appreciably bigger, if they aren’t big enough to bang, what is?

                  Then by what mechanism do you propose an incredibly deep gravity well could spit out bulk stuff?

                  I’m taking the null hypothesis, you’re the one with a claim to prove

                  • Chakravanti@monero.town
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    8 days ago

                    Ask Jack Harkness. I am not a science guy. I see dimensions that are at least difficult to describe. This one, not so much. “Eventually” gravity amps black holes super whatever clustefuck break the line of time to gravity.

                    Your super is little. Sure they act the way you say. Stars are sand. Super might be a mountain but we’re talking about black hole black holes here.

                    Does that make sense?