lumpenproletariat@quokk.au to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 21 hours agotrue liesquokk.auimagemessage-square11linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imagetrue liesquokk.aulumpenproletariat@quokk.au to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 21 hours agomessage-square11linkfedilink
minus-squarelath@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·20 hours agoHere’s how it can go from 0 to 100 real quick: 0-23=77-100 => 0+100=77+23 => 100=100 => 23=77 qed.
minus-squarefor_some_delta@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·18 hours agoI assume the missing statement is throw out the Peano axioms.
minus-squareSidhean@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·18 hours agoAh yes, x=x therefore y=z. I understand what you meant by this /s
minus-squarelath@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·17 hours agoOn a scale of 0 to 100, 77 is to 100 what 23 is to 0.
minus-squareSidhean@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·12 hours agoThey’re lower and higher than eachother, therefore equal to another number. Things are becoming clearer to me
Here’s how it can go from 0 to 100 real quick:
0-23=77-100 => 0+100=77+23 => 100=100 => 23=77
qed.
I assume the missing statement is throw out the Peano axioms.
Ah yes, x=x therefore y=z. I understand what you meant by this /s
On a scale of 0 to 100, 77 is to 100 what 23 is to 0.
They’re lower and higher than eachother, therefore equal to another number. Things are becoming clearer to me
No
Yes