• hperrin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      How did you possibly get that from what I said? Are you purposefully being as uncharitable as possible?

      No, I clearly was not talking about this situation. I was clarifying how your interpretation was correct, but you were factually incorrect.

        • hperrin@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          It’s called pedantry, and I have never failed to own it. At this point, I feel like you’re trying to be overly abrasive.

          Was it not your interpretation that the messages seem to not be from LLMs, because they’re identical? Because that’s literally what you said.

            • hperrin@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Fair enough. Still, why would you misrepresent my view so radically unless you were being uncharitable on purpose?

                • hperrin@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  People confuse LLMs for being non-deterministic all the time. The comment implied that. I want people to understand that LLMs are deterministic, because I don’t want people confusing them with actual intelligence or some sort of “black magic”. But sure man, whatever excuse you need to be an asshole to a stranger.