• encelado748@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Because the need for electricity will only grow the more electrification we do, and doing both is better then doing just one of the two. We need to max-out out production capacity for solar, wind and batteries anyway (and by production I mean combination of grid capacity and rate of expansion, material mining and refinement, labor, legislative bottleneck and capital availability). Anything more is definitionally better, and nuclear is a lot of way complementary with solar, wind, and batteries in materials, fuel, grid usage and operational constraint (namely it is dispatchable and can do load following).

    • Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The need for power will actually shrink with growing electrification, since a lot of those technologies are more energy efficient.

      • encelado748@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The need for power maybe (not counting on that given the greater need caused by AI and the rapid industrialization of Asia and Africa), but the need for electricity will certainly not go down. While an electric car is more efficient, no electricity was used before to power the cars is going to replace.