NomNom@feddit.uk to Canada@lemmy.ca · 2 days agoWhy drug approval in Canada should not rely on foreign regulatorstheconversation.comexternal-linkmessage-square9linkfedilinkarrow-up153arrow-down10
arrow-up153arrow-down1external-linkWhy drug approval in Canada should not rely on foreign regulatorstheconversation.comNomNom@feddit.uk to Canada@lemmy.ca · 2 days agomessage-square9linkfedilink
minus-squareStinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 days agoBecause it was cheaper to rubber stamp based on US rubber stamping.
minus-squaremelsaskca@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·18 hours agoI’m surprised that they’d be less rigourous, especially after thalidomide. Maybe not too surprised I guess…money talks.
minus-squareSaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·12 hours ago I’m surprised that they’d be less rigourous, especially after thalidomide They are careful to not approve dangerous drugs, but they are approving drugs that don’t work.
minus-squareMadMadBunny@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 day agoCheaper on paper, they were an utter pain in the ass sometimes.
Because it was cheaper to rubber stamp based on US rubber stamping.
I’m surprised that they’d be less rigourous, especially after thalidomide. Maybe not too surprised I guess…money talks.
They are careful to not approve dangerous drugs, but they are approving drugs that don’t work.
Cheaper on paper, they were an utter pain in the ass sometimes.