• jedibob5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    I actually heard an argument against permanent DST that I still haven’t really been able to refute. The reasoning was that darker conditions in the mornings during winter could make things more hazardous for kids walking to school. In places with properly pedestrian-friendly infrastructure, it probably wouldn’t be an issue, but at least in more suburban areas, I can’t say I disagree. Changing back and forth twice a year is still silly, but I feel like I might prefer permanent standard time over permanent DST in a lot of places.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      You’re either walking to or from school in the dark in more northern places, it’s an irrelevant argument.

      Shortest day of the year in my city is only 8 hours long.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          When I quit smoking I actually had to start taking my short break and just stand outside just to get some vitamin d from the sun.

          Working in factories, condos or high rises during construction, forget it.

    • Otter@lemmy.caM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Schools can choose to start later in the day if they find it helpful, without needing everyone else to change their clocks and schedules too

    • iamthetot@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      School hours could change. And if you’re far north enough, standard or daylight ain’t gonna matter, there will be times when kids are walking in the dark.

      • jedibob5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You know, I don’t really think that raising a concern about the possibility of kids getting hit by cars that I hadn’t heard discussed much before really falls into the same category as religious wingnuts scaremongering about “subversive” books or drag queens or whatever.

        I didn’t even present it as some sort of urgent, insurmountable problem, I just didn’t have any rebuttal for it in the moment when I heard it. The other replies have brought up good points that could help make it work. Was that really warranted?

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      BC winter is dark and gloomy in the morning and dark again by 3:30. So this won’t mean much for us, other than some actually usable daylight

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I can assure you kids are going to school in the dark when we’re on standard time. I was actually in grade school when the US stayed on DST year round for a hot minute in the 70s. It was no big deal

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s caused (at least in part) by assigning timezones according to politics rather than longitude. Some places have gotten really skewed.

      Anyway, most of us just want the government to pick one thing and stick with it. We don’t care whether they pick DST, ST, or create a new half-hour timezone to split the difference so long as the changing back and forth stops.

    • Godort@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The main reason it still exists is not a good one.

      People are used to it happening and are scared of change.