Ideally the answers aren’t just political soapboxing.

  • mesa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    People think successful software is usually made by huge teams.

    In actuality, most open source is just one or a couple of people building something they found useful and releasing it. Even corporate software is usually a small team. Sure some software has huge numbers of people working on it (google for example) but its not the norm. Your bank app, this site here, all very small teams.

    I remember when bitcoin first started and I got into the idea of sending $$ with it. First couple of years had less than 100 people in total touch it. And 90% of it was a couple of people at most.

    A bit of a tangent, but most software has NO plan if that person or people walk away from the project. Or just straight up die. We live in a somewhat golden era when software has only just started outliving its builders. But watch the next 20-40 years. It will be interesting times.

    • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      21 days ago

      I was surprised when I learned that. Same with the idea that adding more people to a software project doesn’t make it go faster. To be clear, I am very ignorant on software stuff in general.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Even open source projects with lots of contributors, most work is only done by a fairly small number generally. Have seen delegation before though, like “would be cool if you all make PRs for this” where it’s a time consuming but essentially low programming high creative skill task.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Sure some software has huge numbers of people working on it

      But this makes usually a overengineered and buggy bloat for the task at hand. Just like Google.