Well, I would say the test results were conclusive, if nothing else.

  • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve read that, and I don’t think any reasonable person would consider a vehicle being driven on a lake bed to be a vessel.

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, but its owner was storing it in a lake, it’s over 14’ long, and has a (non-functional) motor.

      • Dultas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 day ago

        Have an accident where you drive off a bridge in Texas, get charged with not having a boat registration.

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 day ago

          I wonder if they charged the guy who crashed his Veyron in Galveston Bay? I mean with something other than insurance fraud.

          • toynbee@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            I was trying to figure out why that name sounded familiar. I hadn’t heard of the story you referenced. I’m also pretty sure I’ve never been near anywhere with that name, though I think I might have encountered a road with a similar one.

            Eventually, I remembered a book my then 5yo gave me after it was withdrawn from the school library and offered as a “keep forever” book.

            The book did tell an interesting story partially based on real life first person accounts of a famous storm / flood, but overall it was fictional. There were some details I thought were inappropriate. I don’t know if those details (casual racism and acceptance of same, both by otherwise redeemable characters and by the victims of it; fairly graphic representation of bodily harm) match the reality of the time but, to put it bluntly, I agree with whomever made the decision to withdraw the book from a children’s library.

            (I’m not sure what age group has access to the library. I do think it’s important for schools to allow access to uncomfortable facts, especially of history … But again, my kid was five at the time, so presumably other similarly aged kids also had access and I don’t think that they needed to hear these stories at that age.

            My kid didn’t read, nor appear to want to read, the book, but given that they get freaked out by my surgery scars I don’t think that they would have benefited from doing so.)

            • LePoisson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              I don’t know if those details (casual racism and acceptance of same, both by otherwise redeemable characters and by the victims of it; fairly graphic representation of bodily harm) match the reality of the time

              1900 Texas, yeah, it matches the reality of the time. We’re talking about a state that 40 years before that had voted overwhelmingly to secede from the Union and ousted their governor when he refused to join the Confederacy. We’re talking full on Jim Crow, segregation as law, redlining, employment gating, etc etc - it was very bad.

              But yeah I mean I probably wouldn’t say a 5yo should be engaging with that content, but I could see a 10 year old maybe? It feels 6th grade level is about right for that?

      • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        This would mean every vehicle used to launch a boat would be considered a boat in it’s own right. As well as the trailer.

        • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t know about you, but I don’t tend to store my truck or trailer in the lake?

        • rainwall@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 day ago

          Submarines dont have to be underwater to still be submersibles.

          Sailors are big fans of the boat floating when they want to get on and off the thing. The alternatives are…not so great.

            • rainwall@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Submersibles always float, even when above the water line. They retain their state as submarines regardless of where and whence they float.

              Even in dry dock, where they “float” in the air due to steel beams, they are still submarines.